iPhone 17 Pro Maxにカーボン調フィルムとレンズのみカバーを付けたところ

iPhone 17 Pro Max Camera Protection: Four Covers Compared, and Why a Thick One Narrowed the Flash

This is the English edition of a review from my Japanese YouTube channel, iestaLife. I test gadgets from my home in Japan, so product links go to Amazon Japan.

Quick take

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has a much larger aluminum camera plateau, and I wanted to protect it without hurting photo quality. Over about three weeks I tried four options. A thick cover with open lens holes noticeably narrowed the LED flash beam, so I stopped using it. A slim full cover barely affected photos but looked glossy and toy-like. What I settled on: a carbon-pattern film on the aluminum, plus a lens cover with its glass popped out so only the metal rings remain.

iPhone 17 Pro Max with carbon film and lens-only cover
Carbon-pattern film plus a lens-only cover

What I tested

  • A slim aluminum plate that covers the whole plateau, with glass over the lenses (CANLER)
  • A thick aluminum plate with open holes over the lenses
  • ClearView carbon-pattern and matte films for the aluminum area
  • A Podick lens-only cover (¥1,349 at the time of recording)
  • The same covers with their lens glass removed, used as “frames”

What I found

TypeCoversMy impression
Slim coverSlim coverWhole plateau, plus glass over the lensesEasy to fit; little visible change in photos; glossy finish makes the color look darker
Thick coverThick coverWhole plateau; lenses openFit with Apple’s case; LED beam became narrower; looks bulky
Carbon filmCarbon filmFlat aluminum area onlySoft and easy to apply; hides bubbles; no effect on the LED
Lens-only coverLens-only coverAround the three lensesFits over the film; no visible flare in a dark-room test; glossy

The thick cover changed the flash. Its LED opening is deep, and in a dark room the light spread was clearly narrower than without a cover. Fine as a flashlight, but I didn’t like it for photos.

LED flash spread with and without the thick cover
Left: no cover. Right: thick cover.

The slim cover barely touched image quality. I shot the same scenes outdoors, indoors and toward the sun before and after; in bright light I couldn’t see a difference. Removing it bent the thin plate, so it isn’t reusable.

Film is the most natural option. The carbon pattern hides dust and bubbles and keeps the phone’s original color. The plain matte version is nearly invisible but less forgiving to apply—hold it with tape instead of your fingers.

Applying the carbon film for the first time. I used the ClearView carbon-pattern clear type, made in Japan, which cost about ¥700–800 at the time of the video. It is soft and easy to handle, but it slipped out of place once, so I recommend positioning it with masking tape. No dust-removal sticker is included. The pack also has a piece for the lower part of the camera area, which a case covers anyway; a commenter wished for extra top pieces instead, and I agree, since film is a consumable. A few bubbles got in, but the pattern made them hard to see.

It leaves the lenses bare. For what it’s worth, I have used an iPhone every year without anything on the lens glass and never had a scratch there, though that is no guarantee. If you want a lens-only cover too, put the film on first. I worried the film’s thickness might stop the cover from sitting flat, but the Podick cover I tried later fit fine on top of it. In this video I still ranked film first, for now, for anyone who wants to keep the phone’s original color.

【結論出ました!】iPhone17カメラ部カバー問題、最強は“カーボン調フィルム”【iPhone 17 Pro Max】

Order matters. Put the film on first. A lens-only cover applied first has to come off before you can add film, and it took real force and left adhesive residue.

Lens cover used as a frame with the glass removed
Glass removed: only the metal rings protect the lens edges

Frames only, no glass. The glass in both lens covers pops out with a firm push. With just the rings left, nothing sits over the lenses, and it still fit under a 0.3 mm memumi case and Apple’s own case.

Who it’s for

  • Want the phone to look untouched: carbon or matte film on the aluminum
  • Want lens-edge protection without glass over the lenses: film plus a lens cover used as a frame
  • Use the phone without a case: a slim full cover gives the most peace of mind
  • Want the lenses off the table when the phone lies flat: a thick cover—but expect the flash to change

Watch the video

【LEDライトに影響あり!?】どっちが買い?分厚いカバー vs スリムカバー!iPhone 17 Pro Max カメラ保護の最適解とは?【比較レビュー】

The video is in Japanese. Useful moments: around 4:10 for the LED flash comparison, and 10:30 where I discover the lens glass can be pushed out. I made several follow-up videos on the same setup; the film comparison and the final “frames only” setup are linked from the Japanese article.

Limitations

These are short-term tests on one orange iPhone 17 Pro Max over a few weeks. My photo comparison was informal, shot at different times of day. I could not confirm the product name of the thick cover, so it is not linked. Long-term effects of adhesive on the aluminum finish are unknown; I plan to replace films every few months.

Products

ClearView back protection film, carbon pattern (iPhone 17 Pro Max): on Amazon Japan

ClearView back protection film, matte (iPhone 17 Pro Max): on Amazon Japan

CANLER camera lens cover, slim full-plate type (iPhone 17 Pro Max): on Amazon Japan

Podick lens-only camera cover (iPhone 17 Pro / 17 Pro Max): on Amazon Japan

memumi 0.3 mm ultra-thin case (iPhone 17 Pro Max): on Amazon Japan

Most of these accessories are listed for the Japanese market. The Amazon Japan links above are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Check the listing for the exact model, current price and shipping availability in your region.

More reviews in English

This review is also available in Japanese.